SendX email campaign data deleted from Equibit’s 2023 outreach, documented in the Equibit lawsuit technical-attack record

Court File No. CV-20-00645492-0000
Equibit Group Ltd. v. Attorney General of Canada et al.

Related: Seven Documented Technical Attacks

In a disturbing new development documented in the Equibit Factum, Chris Horlacher discovered that major email campaigns sent through the platform SendX in early 2023 have had nearly all their data wiped.

The Disappearing SendX Campaigns

Chris ran two significant email campaigns through SendX reaching nearly 1,872 contacts. The platform showed clear metrics: one campaign recorded 1,742 sent, 271 opened, and unusually high click activity. An invoice confirmed the account held the expected number of contacts.

Months later, when Chris logged back in, the campaigns data had almost entirely vanished.

The SendX Support Exchange

When confronted on July 25, 2025, SendX support provided shifting and contradictory explanations:

  • First claiming no campaigns existed or no contacts were in the list.
  • Later admitting the campaigns were sent in March 2023 but claiming the data was deleted under a “data retention policy.”
  • Stating the account had been “cancelled” — even though Chris was actively logged in and could view the dashboard.
  • Failing to produce any specific written data retention policy despite repeated requests.

Watch the Support Chat Video:

Screenshots from SendX Dashboard and Support Chat:

Screenshot of a SendX newsletters list
The SendX dashboard showing the two zeroed-out campaigns
Screenshot of a SendX campaign preview of an Equibit email
However, the full-text of the messages remain
Screenshot of a SendX dashboard showing a last sent campaign with send, open and click counts
In some places, the original campaign data is still visible
Screenshot of a SendX account menu for Equibitgroup showing up to 1872 contacts
Even though the contact list was wiped out, the original list total is still visible

Fabricated Data and Cover-Up — The Open Question

Beyond simple data loss, a darker explanation emerges: the campaign metrics themselves may have been fabricated to create the illusion that the emails were successfully delivered, while the messages were secretly censored or blocked from reaching recipients.

This would explain why Chris received zero responses from nearly 2,000 contacts on critically important updates related to the Equibit lawsuits. If the campaigns were never actually sent (or were heavily suppressed), the platform could have generated fake engagement numbers to keep the user believing everything was working normally.

Once the deception was no longer needed — or once Chris began investigating — the fabricated data was hurriedly deleted in what appears to be a sloppy cover-up, leaving behind inconsistent traces and contradictory support responses.

Place in the Equibit Lawsuit

The SendX wipe is recorded in the Equibit Factum and belongs with the technical-attack chronology in Court File No. CV-20-00645492-0000. It sits beside the router, DNS, and workstation incidents collected in Seven Documented Technical Attacks Against Equibit and Chris Horlacher. A vendor “retention policy” that erases campaign evidence after the fact is not self-explanatory. It is another gap the Equibit lawsuit has to put on the record.

This incident fits a larger, documented pattern in the Equibit case where critical digital evidence has repeatedly disappeared or been rendered inaccessible at strategically convenient times:

  • Router logs with impossible timestamps
  • Spontaneous file exfiltration via Microsoft services
  • Repeated honeypot probes
  • DNS manipulation
  • And now — litigation-related email records vanishing from a major platform

Whether this was incompetence, a overly aggressive “privacy” policy, or active collaboration to suppress evidence remains an open and serious question.

Full Documentation Preserved

The complete support transcript, dashboard screenshots showing the original metrics, invoice records, and video of the interaction are being preserved as part of the public evidence on equibitlawsuit.com.

If you believe email platforms should not be able to fabricate delivery data and then delete records tied to active litigation, help spread awareness of this case. This is not how legitimate businesses behave. The public deserves transparency, especially when the stakes involve censorship and the suppression of truth.

Never miss a new article. Subscribe for weekly updates.

Related News

Closed apartment door with a court file, for the Ubitquity statement and the outstanding service on Nathan Wosnack.

Ubitquity’s September Statement Is Not a Defence. Nathan Wosnack Has Not Been Served.

On 18 September 2026 Ubitquity and Nathan Wosnack published a denial of Court File No. CV-26-00017856-0000. It is not a Statement of Defence. Process servers
GrapheneOS phone beside a Keybase session, illustrating the 2021 unauthorized follows recorded in the Equibit lawsuit.

Keybase Compromise: Unauthorized Account Manipulation on a GrapheneOS Device

In October and December 2021 a Keybase account on Chris Horlacher’s GrapheneOS phone followed four users he did not know. All four belonged to a
Windows laptop screen beside a USB port, illustrating the 22 June 2026 display anomalies recorded in the Equibit lawsuit.

USB Plug and Unplug Sounds and Monitor Resolution Changes on Chris Horlacher’s Laptop

On 22 June 2026, while Equibit was preparing its Statement of Claim against Marc Godard, Chris Horlacher’s laptop played USB connect and disconnect sounds and