Skip to content
Equibit LawsuitEquibit LawsuitEquibit Lawsuit
  • Home
  • Cases
    • Equibit v. AGC et alThis action is the foundational case. It alleges that the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and related parties conducted a multi-year campaign of infiltration, entrapment, sabotage, and interference against Equibit Group and its founder. The claim examines duty-of-candour failures in Federal Court warrant proceedings, the Office of the Information Commissioner’s findings that contradict CSIS’s pleadings, and the broader pattern of institutional obstruction. Every subsequent lawsuit draws evidentiary and strategic support from the record established here. It remains the central pillar against which the other actions are measured.
    • Equibit v. Saucier et alFiled early in the litigation sequence, this case targets individuals alleged to have participated in the initial technical and operational sabotage of Equibit’s blockchain protocol and corporate infrastructure. It captures the first concrete acts of interference—code disappearance, developer departure, and related disruptions—that later cases place in a wider institutional context. The Saucier proceedings supply critical timeline and forensic evidence that reinforce both the CSIS action and the later claims against Godard and Wosnack.
    • Equibit v. GodardThis lawsuit focuses on the alleged CSIS officer who embedded himself in Equibit’s operations, later attempted a hostile takeover of related intellectual property, and then disappeared after being served. The Godard claim bridges the intelligence-service allegations of the main CSIS action with the more visible commercial and technical interference documented elsewhere. It demonstrates continuity of actors and methods across years, strengthening the overall narrative of coordinated targeting.
    • Equibit v. Wosnack et alThe newest action addresses the registration and operation of professional impersonation websites at equibit.io and equibit.net, preferential search ranking, and deliberate concealment. It converts the technical and reputational attacks into a clear commercial wrong, while the accompanying Norwich order seeks to pierce the anonymity of those who enabled the sites. This case supplies fresh, highly visible evidence that loops back into the broader pattern established in the CSIS, Saucier, and Godard proceedings.
  • Evidence
  • Media
  • Opinion
  • FAQ
  • Action
  • Toggle website search
Press Escape to close the search panel.
  • Home
  • Cases
    • Equibit v. AGC et al
    • Equibit v. Saucier et al
    • Equibit v. Godard
    • Equibit v. Wosnack et al
  • Evidence
  • Media
  • Opinion
  • FAQ
  • Action
  • Toggle website search
Search this website

CV-21-00654929-0000

Read more about the article Equibit Replies to Defendants’ Statements of Defence
Equibit v. Saucier et al

Equibit Replies to Defendants’ Statements of Defence

Equibit Group Ltd. replied to the Statements of Defence in the 2021 action against Christian Saucier and co-defendants, Court File No. CV-21-00654929-0000.

Comments Off on Equibit Replies to Defendants’ Statements of Defence
August 6, 2021
Read more about the article Statements of Defence Received
Equibit v. Saucier et al

Statements of Defence Received

Defendants in Court File No. CV-21-00654929-0000 filed Statements of Defence and a counterclaim. Equibit’s Reply is recorded separately.

Comments Off on Statements of Defence Received
July 5, 2021
Libertas banner with a QR code and the text "One mission, 54 languages, freedom for all" and "The Philosophy of Liberty"

Post Categories

  • Equibit v. AGC et al
  • Equibit v. Godard
  • Equibit v. Saucier et al
  • Equibit v. Wosnack et al
  • Evidence Files
  • Media
  • Opinion

Recent Posts

  • Eight Red Flags in the Multi-Year Campaign Against Equibit
  • Ubitquity’s September Statement Is Not a Defence. Nathan Wosnack Has Not Been Served.
  • Keybase Compromise: Unauthorized Account Manipulation on a GrapheneOS Device
  • USB Plug and Unplug Sounds and Monitor Resolution Changes on Chris Horlacher’s Laptop
  • Strange Outreach from Sergei Sachkov: Ex Parte Contact During Active Litigation

Recent Comments

No comments to show.
Equibit Lawsuit
Documenting the fight to expose what happened to Equibit Group Ltd. and its founder Chris Horlacher, and to defend the rule of law in Canada. Here you’ll find the court filings, evidence and commentary behind the Equibit lawsuits, with updates as each case moves forward.
X-twitter Github Medium Wikipedia-w Rss
Quick Links
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Action
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
Get Involved
  • Donate
  • Spread the Word
  • Email the Attorney General
  • Email Oversight Bodies
  • Email UN Special Rapporteur
  • Email Human Rights NGOs
Contact
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name *
Checkboxes
Disclaimer: The information on this site reflects allegations and the personal views of Equibit Group Ltd. and Chris Horlacher. All claims regarding CSIS, government agencies, individuals, and third parties are allegations made in pending civil litigation and have not been proven in court. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice.
© 2026 Equibit Lawsuit. All rights reserved. Built by Tech Premier.
Built in support of the rule of law in Canada.
×