Skip to content
Skip to content
Home
Cases
Equibit v. AGC et al
This action is the foundational case. It alleges that the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and related parties conducted a multi-year campaign of infiltration, entrapment, sabotage, and interference against Equibit Group and its founder. The claim examines duty-of-candour failures in Federal Court warrant proceedings, the Office of the Information Commissioner’s findings that contradict CSIS’s pleadings, and the broader pattern of institutional obstruction. Every subsequent lawsuit draws evidentiary and strategic support from the record established here. It remains the central pillar against which the other actions are measured.
Equibit v. Saucier et al
Filed early in the litigation sequence, this case targets individuals alleged to have participated in the initial technical and operational sabotage of Equibit’s blockchain protocol and corporate infrastructure. It captures the first concrete acts of interference—code disappearance, developer departure, and related disruptions—that later cases place in a wider institutional context. The Saucier proceedings supply critical timeline and forensic evidence that reinforce both the CSIS action and the later claims against Godard and Wosnack.
Equibit v. Godard
This lawsuit focuses on the alleged CSIS officer who embedded himself in Equibit’s operations, later attempted a hostile takeover of related intellectual property, and then disappeared after being served. The Godard claim bridges the intelligence-service allegations of the main CSIS action with the more visible commercial and technical interference documented elsewhere. It demonstrates continuity of actors and methods across years, strengthening the overall narrative of coordinated targeting.
Equibit v. Wosnack et al
The newest action addresses the registration and operation of professional impersonation websites at equibit.io and equibit.net, preferential search ranking, and deliberate concealment. It converts the technical and reputational attacks into a clear commercial wrong, while the accompanying Norwich order seeks to pierce the anonymity of those who enabled the sites. This case supplies fresh, highly visible evidence that loops back into the broader pattern established in the CSIS, Saucier, and Godard proceedings.
Evidence
Media
Opinion
FAQ
Action
Home
Cases
Equibit v. AGC et al
Equibit v. Saucier et al
Equibit v. Godard
Equibit v. Wosnack et al
Evidence
Media
Opinion
FAQ
Action
Search this website
Newsletter
Home
>
Newsletter
First name
Last name
Email
I accept the privacy policy
Close Panel
×
