Statement of Claim against CSIS and the Attorney General of Canada — CV-20-00645492-0000

Court File No. CV-20-00645492-0000
Equibit Group Ltd. v. Attorney General of Canada et al.

Related: Sachkov damages award · Four Critical Failures

On 27 October 2023 Equibit Group Ltd. and Chris Horlacher filed their Reply to Sergei Sachkov’s Defence. Sachkov had not participated while default was entered on liability and while damages of $1,744,711 were assessed. Justice Merritt later set that judgment aside. The Reply answers the Defence that followed.

The 27 October 2023 Reply

Read the Reply to Defence here:

Place in the Equibit Lawsuit

The Reply is a pleading in Court File No. CV-20-00645492-0000. The award it answers is Damages Award Granted Against Sergei Sachkov. What happened to that award is Four Critical Failures and CJC file 26-0478.

Sergei Sachkov served as Equibit’s lead core protocol developer. His sudden disappearance in mid-2018, accompanied by the loss of critical source code, occurred at a pivotal moment and contributed significantly to the company’s collapse. After being properly served and failing to defend the action for years, default judgments were granted. Sachkov’s eventual late appearance and filing of a defence necessitated this formal Reply.

The Reply maintains the Plaintiffs’ position and shatters the assertions made in Sachkov’s defence, reinforcing the serious nature of the original claims.

The Broader Pattern

This exchange is another chapter in a case defined by delay, evasion, and procedural complexity. Key individuals implicated in the destruction of Equibit have repeatedly engaged with the legal process only after significant judgments were already issued against them.

For any citizen who expects timely and fair administration of justice, these patterns are troubling. When those accused of harming a Canadian technology company can avoid meaningful participation for years, only to re-enter the proceedings after defaults are entered, it raises legitimate concerns about whether the system adequately deters or punishes such conduct.

Moving Forward

The public documentation campaign at equibitlawsuit.com exists to ensure every major filing and response remains transparent and accessible. The Reply to Defence is now part of the permanent record.

The full Factum of Equibit Group — the comprehensive evidentiary synthesis of the entire case — continues to advance and will be released in due course.

Never miss a new article. Subscribe for weekly updates.

Related News

Fail2Ban SSH ban chart on Equibit Group’s private counsel Jitsi server, July 2025 to May 2026, with the February 2026 Anarchapulco surge

Fail2Ban Logs on Equibit’s Counsel Jitsi Server: 5,622 Bans, Then a Quiet Summer, Then a Resume

Between 30 July 2025 and 26 May 2026 Equibit’s private Jitsi server recorded 5,622 Fail2Ban SSH bans. The February 2026 surge lined up with Anarchapulco.
Wosnack complaint to Rebel.com over the Equibit Statement of Claim page.

Wosnack Asks Rebel.com to Suspend the Statement of Claim Page

Nine days after the Wosnack claim was issued, Ubitquity’s founder asked Equibit’s registrar to take down the page that reports the pleading and to unmask
Office of the Information Commissioner final report findings that contradict CSIS positions in the Equibit lawsuit

Five Things the OIC Final Report Established That Contradict CSIS’s Position

Five findings in the Office of the Information Commissioner’s final report on Chris Horlacher’s CSIS access requests stand in direct tension with the Attorney General’s