Second Supplementary Motion Record and Supplementary Factum Filed

Learn Liberty

philosophy of the liberty
Statement of Claim against CSIS and the Attorney General of Canada — CV-20-00645492-0000

Court File No. CV-20-00645492-0000
Equibit Group Ltd. v. Attorney General of Canada et al.

Related: Damages award · Four Critical Failures

On 16 December 2022 Equibit Group Ltd. filed a Second Supplementary Motion Record and the Moving Party’s Supplementary Factum. Justice Myers had granted default judgment on liability against Sergei Sachkov on 5 October 2022 and deferred damages. Five days after this filing the court assessed $1,744,711.

These filings were made in response to requests arising from the earlier default judgment and provide additional sworn evidence and legal argument in support of the Plaintiffs’ claims.

The 16 December 2022 Filings

Download the Second Supplementary Motion Record here:

On the same day, a Supplementary Factum was also filed, summarizing the evidence presented in the Motion and the relevant case law to support our claims.

Download the Supplementary Factum here:

What the Supplementary Record Contained

The Supplementary Motion Record and Factum include updated evidence and address the Court’s previous requests, notably:

  • The Crowe Soberman valuation report, which provides a professional assessment of damages suffered by Equibit Group Ltd.
  • Further particulars and supporting documentation regarding the quantum of damages claimed.

These materials form an important part of the evidentiary record as the case advances.

Place in the Equibit Lawsuit

These materials sit between Justice Myers’ liability default (5 October 2022) and the 21 December 2022 damages assessment recorded in Damages Award Granted Against Sergei Sachkov. What later happened to that assessment is Four Critical Failures.

Filing supplementary motion records and factums is a standard but critical part of civil litigation, especially in complex cases involving significant damages and institutional defendants. By submitting this material, the Plaintiffs continue to build a detailed, documented case while responding directly to the Court’s directions.

This filing demonstrates Equibit’s commitment to transparency and procedural compliance, even as the government side has, at times, been slow to respond.

The Broader Picture

Every document filed in this proceeding adds to the permanent public record. Despite procedural delays and institutional resistance, the Plaintiffs continue to advance the case methodically and transparently.

The comprehensive public archive at equibitlawsuit.com exists to ensure citizens can review the evidence for themselves.

The full Factum of Equibit Group — the complete evidentiary synthesis of the entire matter — continues to advance and will be released in due course.

Never miss a new article. Subscribe for weekly updates.

Related News

Closed apartment door with a court file, for the Ubitquity statement and the outstanding service on Nathan Wosnack.

Ubitquity’s September Statement Is Not a Defence. Nathan Wosnack Has Not Been Served.

On 18 September 2026 Ubitquity and Nathan Wosnack published a denial of Court File No. CV-26-00017856-0000. It is not a Statement of Defence. Process servers
GrapheneOS phone beside a Keybase session, illustrating the 2021 unauthorized follows recorded in the Equibit lawsuit.

Keybase Compromise: Unauthorized Account Manipulation on a GrapheneOS Device

In October and December 2021 a Keybase account on Chris Horlacher’s GrapheneOS phone followed four users he did not know. All four belonged to a
Windows laptop screen beside a USB port, illustrating the 22 June 2026 display anomalies recorded in the Equibit lawsuit.

USB Plug and Unplug Sounds and Monitor Resolution Changes on Chris Horlacher’s Laptop

On 22 June 2026, while Equibit was preparing its Statement of Claim against Marc Godard, Chris Horlacher’s laptop played USB connect and disconnect sounds and