Affidavit of Chris Horlacher: Sworn Evidence in Support of the CSIS Lawsuit

Document type
Case Files

Matter
Equibit v. AGC et al

Court File No.
CV-20-00645492-0000

Published

Last Updated

Statement of Claim against Nathan Wosnack and Ubitquity, LLC — Ontario court file CV-26-00017856-0000

In this document

Court File No. CV-20-00645492-0000
Equibit Group Ltd. v. Attorney General of Canada et al.

Related: Statement of Claim Against CSIS · Seven Documented Technical Attacks

On 30 March 2022 Chris Horlacher swore and filed an affidavit in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. It is one of the core sworn accounts in the Equibit lawsuit: timeline, technical attacks, and the facts alleged against CSIS and related defendants.

This document represents one of the most comprehensive personal accounts filed in the case to date, setting out key facts, timelines, and evidence supporting the allegations of unlawful surveillance, technical sabotage, and institutional interference.

The 30 March 2022 Affidavit

Read the full Affidavit here:

Place in the Equibit Lawsuit

The affidavit is sworn evidence in Court File No. CV-20-00645492-0000. It supports the Statement of Claim against CSIS. Narrative form of the same chronology: The Assassination of Equibit and Seven Documented Technical Attacks.

In this sworn testimony, Horlacher details the multi-year pattern of events that led to the collapse of Equibit Group Ltd. — a Canadian company developing legitimate blockchain securities technology. The affidavit connects technical attacks, insider actions, regulatory pressure, and financial warfare into a coherent narrative.

Sworn affidavits carry significant weight in civil proceedings. They form part of the formal evidentiary record and subject the deponent to potential cross-examination. By filing this document, Horlacher has placed detailed, firsthand evidence before the Court and the public.

What the Affidavit Covers

The affidavit addresses critical aspects of the case, including:

  • The timeline of suspicious events and technical incidents
  • Interactions with individuals later suspected of acting as human intelligence assets
  • The impact of regulatory and institutional pressure on the company
  • The personal and corporate consequences of the alleged campaign

This filing adds another layer of sworn testimony to the growing public record at equibitlawsuit.com.

The Broader Question

Every formal step in this litigation — whether serving difficult parties, filing sworn evidence, or preserving forensic records — reinforces the central question driving this entire effort:

Is there rule of law in Canada when powerful state agencies and their associates are accused of targeting a private citizen and his company?

The public documentation campaign exists to ensure these materials remain transparent and accessible, regardless of procedural delays or institutional resistance.

The full Factum of Equibit Group — the comprehensive evidentiary synthesis of the entire case — continues to advance and will be released in due course.

Help this story be found.

Search results about this case are being flooded with misleading content, part of what we describe as an SEO poisoning campaign. Every share helps the documented record reach people looking for the facts. Copy the link or share it below.

Never miss a new filing or evidence report.

Subscribe for updates directly from the lawsuit record. We’ll email you a link to confirm your subscription.
Equibit Group Ltd.

Equibit Group Ltd.

Blockchain Protocol Developer

Equibit Group Ltd. is a Canadian technology company that built secure, decentralized infrastructure for securities issuance and peer-to-peer trading. It is now the plaintiff in civil litigation over alleged sabotage of that work, and this account publishes the case updates, filings and evidence documentation for this website.

In this document

Watch Video

philosophy of the liberty

The Philosophy of Liberty

The foundational animated exploration of individual rights, self-ownership, and freedom.

Support the Lawsuit

Civil litigation against state intelligence overreach and corporate sabotage requires continuous support. Take action: