Discovery order compelling a CSIS officer in Equibit v. Attorney General of Canada

On July 25, 2025, the Attorney General of Canada delivered a letter stating that a “Michael” will be attending the upcoming discovery session in August. He is a CSIS Officer working in the Litigation and Disclosure branch. He previously worked as a covert agent in HUMINT operations. This is a major milestone in the case, CV-20-00645492-0000, taking nearly five years to finally arrive at.

A very nervous CSIS officer during discovery.

The letter asserts that “Michael” will confirm that CSIS had no knowledge of Equibit Group, its founders, employees, or business activities. They attempt to put on a confident face, but around this exact same time a hacker begins an all-out digital assault on Chris, whose incredibly illegal attacks (some carrying a life sentence in the Criminal Code) were logged and analyzed by Chris and several IT professionals. At the same time the same hacker also attempted an illegal hostile takeover of Equibit Group, with the stated intent of terminating the lawsuits.

This tactic by the Attorney General was altogether a complete failure. Not only did the CSIS Officer demonstrate the Attorney General perjured themselves in their Statement of Defense during examination, but Chris’s investigative techniques were finally able to put a positive ID on the CSIS Officer who had originally orchestrated the downfall of Equibit Group.

The 25 July 2025 Letter

Below is a copy of the letter received from the Attorney General.

Why Discovery Matters in This File

Since the Statement of Claim was served in August 2020, the government has employed various procedural tactics that substantially delayed the progress of the case. The Court’s decision to force CSIS into the discovery phase is therefore a hard-won victory for transparency and accountability.

Discovery is one of the most important stages in civil litigation. It is where parties are required to disclose relevant documents and where witnesses can be examined under oath. This milestone means the Plaintiffs will now have the opportunity to test the government’s position with concrete evidence and compel production of records that have long been sought.

Delay Before Examination

This development fits the larger pattern documented throughout this site: prolonged institutional resistance, procedural delays, and repeated obstacles placed in the path of accountability. The fact that it required years of persistent effort simply to reach the discovery stage raises serious questions about whether powerful state actors are being held to the same standards as ordinary citizens.

For any Canadian who still wants to believe in procedural fairness and the rule of law, these timelines are troubling. Basic steps in the justice process should not require extraordinary persistence when the defendant is the Government of Canada.

The Public Record After Discovery

The public documentation campaign at equibitlawsuit.com exists to ensure these milestones remain transparent and accessible to all. Every court order, every filing, and every piece of evidence obtained through discovery will be preserved and added to the permanent record.

The full Factum of Equibit Group — the comprehensive evidentiary synthesis of the entire case — continues to advance and will be released in due course.

Further Reading

Never miss a new article. Subscribe for weekly updates.

Related News

Fail2Ban SSH ban chart on Equibit Group’s private counsel Jitsi server, July 2025 to May 2026, with the February 2026 Anarchapulco surge

Fail2Ban Logs on Equibit’s Counsel Jitsi Server: 5,622 Bans, Then a Quiet Summer, Then a Resume

Between 30 July 2025 and 26 May 2026 Equibit’s private Jitsi server recorded 5,622 Fail2Ban SSH bans. The February 2026 surge lined up with Anarchapulco.
Wosnack complaint to Rebel.com over the Equibit Statement of Claim page.

Wosnack Asks Rebel.com to Suspend the Statement of Claim Page

Nine days after the Wosnack claim was issued, Ubitquity’s founder asked Equibit’s registrar to take down the page that reports the pleading and to unmask
Office of the Information Commissioner final report findings that contradict CSIS positions in the Equibit lawsuit

Five Things the OIC Final Report Established That Contradict CSIS’s Position

Five findings in the Office of the Information Commissioner’s final report on Chris Horlacher’s CSIS access requests stand in direct tension with the Attorney General’s