Skip to content
Equibit LawsuitEquibit Lawsuit
  • Home
  • Cases
    • Equibit v. AGC et alThis action is the foundational case. It alleges that the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and related parties conducted a multi-year campaign of infiltration, entrapment, sabotage, and interference against Equibit Group and its founder. The claim examines duty-of-candour failures in Federal Court warrant proceedings, the Office of the Information Commissioner’s findings that contradict CSIS’s pleadings, and the broader pattern of institutional obstruction. Every subsequent lawsuit draws evidentiary and strategic support from the record established here. It remains the central pillar against which the other actions are measured.
    • Equibit v. Saucier et alFiled early in the litigation sequence, this case targets individuals alleged to have participated in the initial technical and operational sabotage of Equibit’s blockchain protocol and corporate infrastructure. It captures the first concrete acts of interference—code disappearance, developer departure, and related disruptions—that later cases place in a wider institutional context. The Saucier proceedings supply critical timeline and forensic evidence that reinforce both the CSIS action and the later claims against Godard and Wosnack.
    • Equibit v. GodardThis lawsuit focuses on the alleged CSIS officer who embedded himself in Equibit’s operations, later attempted a hostile takeover of related intellectual property, and then disappeared after being served. The Godard claim bridges the intelligence-service allegations of the main CSIS action with the more visible commercial and technical interference documented elsewhere. It demonstrates continuity of actors and methods across years, strengthening the overall narrative of coordinated targeting.
    • Equibit v. Wosnack et alThe newest action addresses the registration and operation of professional impersonation websites at equibit.io and equibit.net, preferential search ranking, and deliberate concealment. It converts the technical and reputational attacks into a clear commercial wrong, while the accompanying Norwich order seeks to pierce the anonymity of those who enabled the sites. This case supplies fresh, highly visible evidence that loops back into the broader pattern established in the CSIS, Saucier, and Godard proceedings.
  • Evidence
  • Media
  • Opinion
  • FAQ
  • Action
  • Home
  • Cases
    • Equibit v. AGC et al
    • Equibit v. Saucier et al
    • Equibit v. Godard
    • Equibit v. Wosnack et al
  • Evidence
  • Media
  • Opinion
  • FAQ
  • Action
Search this website

cia

  1. Home>
  2. Archives>
  3. cia>
  4. Page 2
Read more about the article Attorney General of Canada Finally Files Statement of Defense – Over a Year Late
Equibit v. AGC et al

Attorney General of Canada Finally Files Statement of Defense – Over a Year Late

On October 1, 2021, more than a year after Equibit Group Ltd. served its Statement of Claim, the Attorney General of Canada finally delivered a Statement of Defense in the…

Comments Off on Attorney General of Canada Finally Files Statement of Defense – Over a Year Late
October 1, 2021
Read more about the article CSIS Informant Located and Served: A Major Milestone in the Lawsuit
Equibit v. AGC et al

CSIS Informant Located and Served: A Major Milestone in the Lawsuit

On February 9, 2022, Equibit Group Ltd. achieved a significant breakthrough in its lawsuit against the Government of Canada: the successful location and service of a key CSIS informant who…

Comments Off on CSIS Informant Located and Served: A Major Milestone in the Lawsuit
February 9, 2021
Read more about the article Attorney General Files Notice of Intent to Defend in CSIS Lawsuit
Equibit v. AGC et al

Attorney General Files Notice of Intent to Defend in CSIS Lawsuit

On October 13, 2020, the Attorney General of Canada filed a Notice of Intent to Defend in response to Equibit Group Ltd.’s Statement of Claim against CSIS and other Crown…

Comments Off on Attorney General Files Notice of Intent to Defend in CSIS Lawsuit
October 26, 2020
  • Go to the previous page
  • 1
  • 2

Post Categories

  • Equibit v. AGC et al
  • Equibit v. Godard
  • Equibit v. Saucier et al
  • Equibit v. Wosnack et al
  • Evidence Files
  • Media
  • Opinion

Recent Posts

  • CSIS and the Canadian Entrapment Factory: A Pattern of Orchestrated Threats
  • Four Critical Failures in the Handling of the Default Judgment Against Sergei Sachkov
  • Chris Horlacher’s Third Appearance on Declare Your Independence
  • Six Key Facts About the Impersonation Websites
  • Targeted Communication Disruption: WhatsApp Call Block at Anarchapulco 2026

Recent Comments

No comments to show.
Find what you are looking for and experience the difference.
Get In Touch Opens in a new tab
Equibit Lawsuit
Documenting the fight to expose what happened to Equibit Group Ltd. and its founder Chris Horlacher — and to defend the rule of law in Canada.
X-twitter Github Medium Wikipedia-w Rss
Quick Links
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Action
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
Get Involved
  • Donate
  • Spread the Word
  • Email the Attorney General
  • Email Oversight Bodies
  • Email UN Special Rapporteur
  • Email Human Rights NGOs
Contact
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name *
Checkboxes *
Disclaimer: The information on this site reflects allegations and the personal views of Equibit Group Ltd. and Chris Horlacher. All claims regarding CSIS, government agencies, individuals, and third parties are allegations made in pending civil litigation and have not been proven in court. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice.
© 2026 Equibit Lawsuit. All rights reserved. Built by Tech Premier.
Built in support of the rule of law in Canada.
Close Panel
×