Skip to content
Skip to content
Equibit Lawsuit
  • Home
  • Cases
    • Equibit v. AGC et alThis action is the foundational case. It alleges that the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and related parties conducted a multi-year campaign of infiltration, entrapment, sabotage, and interference against Equibit Group and its founder. The claim examines duty-of-candour failures in Federal Court warrant proceedings, the Office of the Information Commissioner’s findings that contradict CSIS’s pleadings, and the broader pattern of institutional obstruction. Every subsequent lawsuit draws evidentiary and strategic support from the record established here. It remains the central pillar against which the other actions are measured.
    • Equibit v. Saucier et alFiled early in the litigation sequence, this case targets individuals alleged to have participated in the initial technical and operational sabotage of Equibit’s blockchain protocol and corporate infrastructure. It captures the first concrete acts of interference—code disappearance, developer departure, and related disruptions—that later cases place in a wider institutional context. The Saucier proceedings supply critical timeline and forensic evidence that reinforce both the CSIS action and the later claims against Godard and Wosnack.
    • Equibit v. GodardThis lawsuit focuses on the alleged CSIS officer who embedded himself in Equibit’s operations, later attempted a hostile takeover of related intellectual property, and then disappeared after being served. The Godard claim bridges the intelligence-service allegations of the main CSIS action with the more visible commercial and technical interference documented elsewhere. It demonstrates continuity of actors and methods across years, strengthening the overall narrative of coordinated targeting.
    • Equibit v. Wosnack et alThe newest action addresses the registration and operation of professional impersonation websites at equibit.io and equibit.net, preferential search ranking, and deliberate concealment. It converts the technical and reputational attacks into a clear commercial wrong, while the accompanying Norwich order seeks to pierce the anonymity of those who enabled the sites. This case supplies fresh, highly visible evidence that loops back into the broader pattern established in the CSIS, Saucier, and Godard proceedings.
  • Evidence
  • Media
  • Opinion
  • FAQ
  • Action
  • Home
  • Cases
    • Equibit v. AGC et al
    • Equibit v. Saucier et al
    • Equibit v. Godard
    • Equibit v. Wosnack et al
  • Evidence
  • Media
  • Opinion
  • FAQ
  • Action
Search this website

Monthly Archives: June 2026

  1. Home>
  2. 2026>
  3. June
Read more about the article The OSC Experience: How Canada’s Securities Regulator Allegedly Weaponized “Compliance” Against Equibit
Evidence Files

The OSC Experience: How Canada’s Securities Regulator Allegedly Weaponized “Compliance” Against Equibit

One of the most revealing chapters in the Equibit saga is the company’s prolonged and highly irregular engagement with the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC). What began as routine regulatory inquiries…

0 Comments
June 29, 2026
Read more about the article SendX Deletes Critical Email Campaign Data: Evidence of Fabrication and Censorship?
Evidence Files

SendX Deletes Critical Email Campaign Data: Evidence of Fabrication and Censorship?

In a disturbing new development documented in the Equibit Factum, Chris Horlacher discovered that major email campaigns sent through the platform SendX in early 2023 have had nearly all their…

0 Comments
June 22, 2026
Read more about the article Zersetzung in the Digital Age: The Silent Assassination of Equibit and the Return of Stasi Tactics in the West
Opinion

Zersetzung in the Digital Age: The Silent Assassination of Equibit and the Return of Stasi Tactics in the West

When the Berlin Wall fell in November 1989, the world celebrated the end of one of history’s most oppressive regimes. East Germans stormed the headquarters of the Ministry for State…

0 Comments
June 15, 2026
Read more about the article De-Banking and Institutional Pressure: The Systematic Financial Sabotage of Chris Horlacher
Evidence Files

De-Banking and Institutional Pressure: The Systematic Financial Sabotage of Chris Horlacher

A recurring and particularly damaging element in the campaign against Equibit Group founder Chris Horlacher has been the repeated disruption of his access to banking and payment systems — commonly…

0 Comments
June 8, 2026
Read more about the article Honeypot Probes: Government-Linked Network Activity, Link-Local Addresses, and Immediate Suspicious Reactions
Evidence Files

Honeypot Probes: Government-Linked Network Activity, Link-Local Addresses, and Immediate Suspicious Reactions

By December 2020 CSIS was deep in default of filing its defense, and Chris Horlacher suspected they would attempt to undermine the lawsuits via other means. After experiencing persistent and…

0 Comments
June 1, 2026

Post Categories

  • Equibit v. AGC et al
  • Equibit v. Godard
  • Equibit v. Saucier et al
  • Equibit v. Wosnack et al
  • Evidence Files
  • Media
  • Opinion

Recent Posts

  • Statement of Claim Filed Against Nathan Wosnack and Ubitquity, LLC
  • SEO Poisoning: How Search Results Are Weaponized Against Targets
  • Complaint Filed with the Canadian Judicial Council Against Justice Loretta P. Merritt
  • De-Banked Again: Wise Joins Revolut in Cutting Off Chris Horlacher and Equibit Group
  • Built to Fail: Chris Horlacher Returns to That Channel’s Liquid Lunch to Discuss Intelligence Community Infiltration of Canadian Business

Recent Comments

No comments to show.
Find what you are looking for and experience the difference.
Get In Touch Opens in a new tab
Documenting the fight to expose what happened to Equibit Group Ltd. and its founder Chris Horlacher — and to defend the rule of law in Canada.
X-twitter Github Medium Wikipedia-w Rss

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Action
  • FAQ
  • Privacy

Get Involved

  • Donate
  • Spread the Word
  • Email the Attorney General
  • Email Oversight Bodies
  • Email UN Special Rapporteur
  • Email Human Rights NGOs

Contact

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name *
Checkboxes *
Disclaimer: The information on this site reflects allegations and the personal views of Equibit Group Ltd. and Chris Horlacher. All claims regarding CSIS, government agencies, individuals, and third parties are allegations made in pending civil litigation and have not been proven in court. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice.
© 2026 Equibit Lawsuit. All rights reserved. Built by Tech Premier.
Built in support of the rule of law in Canada.
Close Panel
×